Val Loumber

(916) 252-0200
Val 20loumber 202x3

VAL LOUMBER has extensive experience in appeals, bankruptcy (including litigation), business litigation, creditor rights, and insolvency.  In addition to these practice areas, Val practices ADR, primarily advising attorneys on complex cases.

Val brings nearly 20 years of singular legal experience to clients.  By joining the HMS Law Group family, Val is reentering private practice after 14 years with the federal judiciary as Judicial Staff Attorney, working with federal Bankruptcy Judges Michael S. McManus (ret.) (Sept. 2005-Jan. 2019) and Fredrick E. Clement (Dec. 2018-Aug. 2019).  In addition to his trial court experience, Val served as Staff Attorney with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (Sept. 2005-Feb. 2008).

While with the federal judiciary, Val prepared over 25,000 written dispositions, including thousands of dispositions in complex bankruptcy and business disputes.  Prior to that, he worked as an attorney at Wendel Rosen LLP (formerly Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean, LLP).

In addition to bankruptcy-related matters, Val enjoys working with business owners, helping them grow and preserve value in their businesses.

Val has lived in the Sacramento area for the majority of his life.  His passion is relationships, people, and outdoor activities.

SAMPLE OF CASES:
  • Fiberglass Representatives, Inc. v. Atkins (In re Atkins), Adv. Proc. No. 87-2153. Granting reconsideration of denial of sale of a real property to enforce a judgment, involving an entanglement of the law of the case with a prior inconsistent judgment.
  • J. Re-Bar Corp., Inc. v. United States (In re J.J. Re-Bar Corp., Inc.), Bankr. Case No. 98-21421. Holding that the debtor's chapter 11 plan does not trump the Anti-Injunction Act to enjoin the collection of trust fund recovery penalties against the debtor's officers as responsible persons for unpaid employee withholding trust fund taxes; affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals BAP and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and reported at 420 B.R. 496 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2009) and 644 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2011), correspondingly.
  • In re City of Vallejo, Bankr. Case No. 08-26813 (largest city municipality chapter 9 case at the time). Approval of chapter 9 plan.
  • In re City of Vallejo, 403 B.R. 72 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2009). Permitting the rejection of collective bargaining agreements by a chapter 9 debtor, upon satisfaction of the standard of Supreme Court's Bildisco decision.
  • In re Bauer, Bankr. Case No. 09-21019. Granting in part sanctions for violations of the automatic stay and discharge injunction. Affirmed on appeal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals BAP and reported at 2010 WL 6452899.
  • In re Saiyo, Bankr. Case No. 10-53041. Sustaining an objection by the debtor to the $38 million proof of claim of a foreign creditor.
  • In re Davis Area Cooperative Housing Association, Inc., Bankr. Case No. 10-30314. Granting a summary judgment motion by an involuntary debtor.
  • In re Matterhorn Group, Inc., Consolidated Bankr. Case No. 10-39672. Denying rejection of three collective bargaining agreements by the consolidated debtors (Matterhorn Group, Inc., Vitafreeze Frozen Confections, Inc., and Deluxe Ice Cream Company).
  • In re Nordlund, 494 B.R. 507 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2011). Awarding sanctions against a creditor for violation of the discharge injunction.
  • In re Cal State Growth Fund, Bankr. Case No. 11-30626. Appointing a chapter 11 trustee for a debtor involved in a complex mortgage investment scheme.
  • Hopper v. Showalter (In re Showalter), Bankr. Case No. 12-22720. Sustaining chapter 7 trustee's objection to the debtor's homestead exemption. Affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel and reported at 2013 WL 1491003.
  • Sihabouth v. The Bank of New York Mellon (In re Sihabouth), Adv. Proc. No. 13-2016. Dismissing adversary proceeding due to lack of post chapter 13 plan confirmation subject matter jurisdiction. Affirmed on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals BAP and reported at 2014 WL 2978550.
  • The Golden 1 Credit Union v. Hopper (In re Ahrens), Bankr. Case No. 14-29813. Sustaining the trustee's objection to Golden 1's deficiency unsecured proof of claim, with a vehicle as collateral, while the debtor was current with ongoing payments on account of the claim. Affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals BAP and reported at 2016 WL 6427279.
  • In re te Velde, Bankr. Case No. 18-11651. Applying judicial estoppel, among other grounds, to deny a $3.66 million administrative expense claim in a large dairy chapter 11 case.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS:

Central California Bankruptcy Association

Sacramento County Bar Association

EDUCATION:

J.D., University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, With Distinction

B.A., Human Biology (major), Chemistry (minor), La Sierra University

Testimonials

“Everyone we dealt with at HMS was very professional and helpful. We would recommend HMS to a friend or family member.” Jeff and Cori S.

"The level of service, trust, understanding and genuine caring cannot be surpassed! I know my family is in the best care possible with HMS Law Group." Lois M.

"I feel I entered as a client and am leaving as a friend." Carole C.

"Overall, it was a very educational and informative experience. It was worth every dollar spent. I totally recommend HMS Law Group LLP." Trudy

Menu